Skip to main content

Horrible things could be missing from your plane's log book.. and still be perfectly legal. FAR 14 91.417

You're buying a plane, you and your broker carefully study the logs and are very happy with the spectacular history the plane has. What a deal!

But what if...a bunch of nasty stuff has been removed from the logs. And it's done completely legally? FAR 14 91.417 Maintenance Records clearly lists what record keeping is required. The question we will answer here is what's not needed. Let's start with looking at minimal set of what's needed:
  • Must keep "permanent records" forever on engine, air frame and props:
    • Total time in service
    • Time since overhaul
    • Time since last inspection
  • AD directives
Here';s an example of an engine log that is very minimal but completely legal:
  • 1150 total time in service
  • 1150 since last overhaul
  • 150 hours since last inspection
  • ADs list that has been complied with
  • Manufactured in 2001
These can be written on a napkin, you don't need a logbook. Notice there are no entries from a mechanic, these are only necessary for last 12 months in operation. If the plane has been sitting for 366 days all records can be destroyed. As for the times above? They need to be written down.. somewhere. On a napkin is technically legal.

Expiring Records
Everything else is an "expiring record", to be kept for 12 months after work is done, or, if same work is repeated, superseded by previous.

If a seller wants to increase the price of a plane with a spotty history, they can make a whole new log book. There are no regulations about "selective" record keeping.

Hard landing inspection? Remove it.
Prop strike? Remove it.
Collapsed landing gear? Remove it.
Upgraded to a new starter? Keep it.
Oil changes? Keep them all.

Next big question: Why do you care?
  1. If the FAA asks you to provide them with maintenance records, you don't need to give them full log books, just the minimums listed above. 12 months of records, running times, and inspection status.
  2. If you're a buyer, assume that someone has altered record and removed bad stuff.
  3. If you're a seller you could increase value by making records seem nicer than they really are.
  4. If you're an owner and you think you know your plane's history, think again.
Looking at this from FAA perspective it makes sense. The plane must be kept in airworthy condition to fly, and life limited parts and inspections must documented. What happened 5 years ago to the plane? They don't care. Even if there was some incidents, the plane was brought to airworthy level again if it's flying today, so the details of history are not important to the FAA.

I think the the big misunderstanding for owners is that we incorrectly assume log books are an absolute source of truth designed to provide information to future owners. Really, they're for FAA and airworthiness status. Not for valuation purposes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE COPA CIRRUS SR22 PERFORMANCE REPORT

About this report This report was generated from data collected from 160 active COPA SR22 pilots. You can see the original survey here: http://tinyurl.com/sr22cruisesurvey . You can download PDF . Table of Contents What you will get out of this report Who were the pilots behind this survey What aircraft are counted in the survey Actual cruise speed and fuel flow Fuel flow vs TAS for NA lean of peak operations What is the most efficient altitude for NA SR22? Turbo SR22 performance at high and low altitudes Are TKS/FIKI planes slower? What is the fastest NA SR22 by generation? Who gets the best range? Are high hour NA SR22 engines slower and do they burn more fuel? How do LoP vs RoP performance compare? POH vs actual performance for NA Who is the fastest SR22? Conclusion About the author Frequently asked questions What you will get out of this report This report is for SR22 owners and buyers. How your SR22 performs compared to other SR22s How altitude affects perfo...

Why a SR22 leaseback is the worst financial decision an airplane owner can make

Airplane leaseback seem like a really good idea - your airplane becomes a business, generates income, which pays for maintenance, insurance, storage, and might even put a few bucks in your pocket. You'll hear this from flight schools, FBOs, airplane brokers and airplane manufacturers. The proposal I received for leaseback on my own plane looked very good, $72,000 income per year! The ugly truth is you leasebacks are a terrible financial decision. You're better off to park your plane in a hangar and not fly it at all. This was the proposal I received: Profit calculation for G2 SR22 in KFRG $300/hr rental rate -20% management fee $60 $240/hr income 300 hrs flown = $72,000 income per year First, there are some baseline increases due to more expensive commercial insurance and higher cost tiedown and required maintenance. These numbers are for an SR22 that was to be based out of KFRG. Annual fixed-cost increases to go to the flight school Flight sch...

How to configure engine power 55%, 65%, 75% on Piper Archer / Piper Cherokee

Most pilots, even CFIs, don't understand how to properly configure engine for various altitudes on a simple Piper Archer. The advice of "full rich below 3000" is simply wrong. Below is a simplified procedure based on the POH. It will ensure better performance, longer range, and longer engine life. The advice of "lean until running rough, then add some" is better, but still imprecise.  First, see POH section 4.27 CRUISING on how to configure engine. Simplified procedures Climb Mixture, throttle full forward Note the EGT temperature just after takeoff As you climb EGT will drop (too rich). Every 500 or 1000', lean mixture slightly to raise EGT back to the temperature you noted on takeoff.  DO NOT allow temperature to get higher than this! At 6000' lean much more to get peak EGT. Note the temperature. Every 600 or 1000' above 6000' are-lean mixture to get back to peak EGT. Best Power Cruise (fly fast): Mixture, th...