Skip to main content

Hurricane study by data scientist: surprisingly I am not seeing the explosive growth

This report is an analysis on hurricanes, surprisingly I am not seeing the explosive growth that documentaries show. I took the raw list of hurricanes from wikipedia to make landfall in US 1850-2018 and did an analysis.
This is a “strength” study. Each hurricane gets points which is the square of its category, so cat 5 = 25 points, cat 2 = 4 points. It’s an annual study where we sum up the points of all hurricanes happening within one calendar year.
1.png
There is no clear pattern of exponential growth in strength. In fact in 2005 strength appears to be all time low. This is the same study by decade where we sum up the points of all hurricanes happening in 10 year periods.
7
You may think the exponential scoring is unfair, so we can try a linear. Here, the points assigned to each hurricane is equal to its category. So two cat 3 hurricanes in one year = 6 points.
8.png
This is a color coded study showing counts by hurricane category. Here I added a polynomial trend line. Over 200 years see a linear increase, but this could be attributed to missing data in the 1800s. Did locals on Barbuda have a telegram to tell mainland about a category 4 hurricane that passed over and wiped everything off the map? Unluckily. Today everything is documented from space and NOAA airplanes.
3.png
Again you can see in the 1980s there was an increase in # of category 2, (red), but we see the same back 1920s.
4.png
Above we show just category 3-5, we can see in 2010+ there are more category 4 than ever before, but there are far fewer cat 3 and no cat 5, and the 10 years prior had a record low, so not clear if there’s any pattern of intensification here.
Next up is an absolute count of hurricanes in north Atlantic (these typically pass through Caribbean). By pure count, we do see an upward trend. I added a 5 year trend line.
Again, I do wonder how accurate record keeping is from 1800s. The Caribbean and US had inhabitants and they could measure wind and send telegrams but did they really capture as much data as we get today? Pretty unlikely.
5.png
This graph covers just the more recent 1980-2018 time period, again, doesn’t look like a trend showing exponential growth.
6.png
Data Sources: I grabbed data from  Wikipedia Hurricane Data and Hurricane Atlantic Data. and cleaned it up for analysis

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE COPA CIRRUS SR22 PERFORMANCE REPORT

About this report This report was generated from data collected from 160 active COPA SR22 pilots. You can see the original survey here: http://tinyurl.com/sr22cruisesurvey . You can download PDF . Table of Contents What you will get out of this report Who were the pilots behind this survey What aircraft are counted in the survey Actual cruise speed and fuel flow Fuel flow vs TAS for NA lean of peak operations What is the most efficient altitude for NA SR22? Turbo SR22 performance at high and low altitudes Are TKS/FIKI planes slower? What is the fastest NA SR22 by generation? Who gets the best range? Are high hour NA SR22 engines slower and do they burn more fuel? How do LoP vs RoP performance compare? POH vs actual performance for NA Who is the fastest SR22? Conclusion About the author Frequently asked questions What you will get out of this report This report is for SR22 owners and buyers. How your SR22 performs compared to other SR22s How altitude affects perfo...

Why a SR22 leaseback is the worst financial decision an airplane owner can make

Airplane leaseback seem like a really good idea - your airplane becomes a business, generates income, which pays for maintenance, insurance, storage, and might even put a few bucks in your pocket. You'll hear this from flight schools, FBOs, airplane brokers and airplane manufacturers. The proposal I received for leaseback on my own plane looked very good, $72,000 income per year! The ugly truth is you leasebacks are a terrible financial decision. You're better off to park your plane in a hangar and not fly it at all. This was the proposal I received: Profit calculation for G2 SR22 in KFRG $300/hr rental rate -20% management fee $60 $240/hr income 300 hrs flown = $72,000 income per year First, there are some baseline increases due to more expensive commercial insurance and higher cost tiedown and required maintenance. These numbers are for an SR22 that was to be based out of KFRG. Annual fixed-cost increases to go to the flight school Flight sch...

How to configure engine power 55%, 65%, 75% on Piper Archer / Piper Cherokee

Most pilots, even CFIs, don't understand how to properly configure engine for various altitudes on a simple Piper Archer. The advice of "full rich below 3000" is simply wrong. Below is a simplified procedure based on the POH. It will ensure better performance, longer range, and longer engine life. The advice of "lean until running rough, then add some" is better, but still imprecise.  First, see POH section 4.27 CRUISING on how to configure engine. Simplified procedures Climb Mixture, throttle full forward Note the EGT temperature just after takeoff As you climb EGT will drop (too rich). Every 500 or 1000', lean mixture slightly to raise EGT back to the temperature you noted on takeoff.  DO NOT allow temperature to get higher than this! At 6000' lean much more to get peak EGT. Note the temperature. Every 600 or 1000' above 6000' are-lean mixture to get back to peak EGT. Best Power Cruise (fly fast): Mixture, th...